science has provided many benefits, but also weapons of mass destruction, so I guess it,s a mixed bag.
either way that has little to do with origins science, which by its very nature is not subject to the scientific method of observation, testability , repeatability except in a much more limited sense.
it does of course suit the evolutionist to equate both aspects, as if one is unscientific if they don't evolutionism.
stu objects to the faith of "medieval peasants" being taught to our children. well we object to fanciful ideas of evolutionism being taught as though it were proven scientific fact.

creation, shimrod, was standard Christian teaching long before US politics. it is a weak argument anyway. is something wrong, because YOU object to the politics of the scientist?!