pitiful response , musket. guilt by association . the priests who do such things are inconsistent with what they profess.
I would not suppose they were sincere believers , would you.
either way what they have done hardly disproves Christianity, still less that there is a creator.
and whats with the cut and paste talk? we all get our info from somewhere. I thought cut and paste was directly transferring passages from elsewhere. I am one finger typing, not doing anything tech.

someone above said something about what cant be tested is not scientific and a myth.
like I say - evolutionism is the biggest myth around .

troubadour - how would you know if creation scientists have qualification in evolutionism or not. have you read their bios?
if you had, I don't think you would make such a blanket statement.
mind you, being dishonest must have an evolutionary benefit! but I will assume it was an honest mistake, at this stage.

ok shimrod, if you insist your belief in something from nothing via no one is not a faith position, you need to show us the evidence, either that it happened, or that it can happen.
and it better be better than steves, who seems to be saying that the evidence consists of the fact that we are here in this world?!
methinks he is the one struggling like mad.