Because if you weren't lying, or being confused, and I expect it to be a combination, society would have ceased to function a long time ago. Viroaemia is the transmission medium and women can be infected in the same way and by the same means as men.

Because we have a programme of testing for people who feel at risk together with encouraging results from contact tracing, I can report that if other at risk groups behaved as responsibly as male gays at risk, we would be even better.

The large number of gay men coming forward for testing is good news, an excellent responsible approach by all but the inevitable hard to reach groups and the fact that nearly half of those testing positive last year were gay men is a sign of the system working, you thick cunt.

I welcome debate on reaching out to promiscuous women and heterosexual men, substance misuse addicts and those who form sexual relationships with them. The upward figures for gay men is good, more from other at risk groups would be better.

I certainly don't welcome debate on the merits of stigmatising gay men, many of whom apparently find anal sex as off putting as I do, if I were to think about it. I don't welcome any input by evil minded shallow witted small men who think it is acceptable to use words such as perverts or hint at paedophilia as an aspect of being gay. I doubt anyone shares your wish to force gay men to register with the authorities and be assaulted, by testing without their consent. It's against the law for starters.

If you must carry on your fascination of the bedrooms of others, may I suggest visiting websites that cater for such voyeuristic fantasy?