If you are going to reignite the thread on the basis of historians who don't share Keith's establishment revision, we'll be here all bloody year.......

In the absence of his reply yet, let me guess it.

That's only one! I bet you can't find any others. Because there aren't any! I'm right, you're wrong and I have every historian on my side.

Apart from the one you just mentioned.

Oh, and the others.

Oh, everybody other than me is capable of reading and forming their own conclusions whereas I read the one offered and proclaim it as the definitive only explanation of the facts.

I am a model citizen.

Dribble