Been there - done that - doesn't matter anyway - whoever said it would be inspiring genocidal provoking racism - you are still saying it.

Your responses to the fact that Britain had been exposed as selling weapons to Assad during his murderous Homs campaign, where his snipers were deliberately targeting children-in-arms in order to kill the mother by shooting through the child.
The snipers were holding bets for cigarettes for how many 'hits' they made.
You had this pointed out to you – here are some of your excuses
Would you like me to provide links to your claiming the white phosphorous used by Israeli troops in Palestine, to be 'harmless illumination' – along with the photographs of children burnt to the bone, of course?
Best wishes, Your ever respectful
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Homs horror
From: Keith A of Hertford - PM
Date: 11 Feb 12 - 03:15 PM

Even liberal democracies have to deal with riots.
Non-lethal crowd control techniques are preferrable to live rounds.
If only Syria would restrict its security forces to using tear gas and water.
It would not be such a crime to supply such things, compared to what Russia and China supplies.


Subject: RE: BS: Homs horror
From: Keith A of Hertford - PM
Date: 11 Feb 12 - 09:21 AM

But why do you ONLY criticise Britain?
Not Russia.
Not China.
Not Syria.
Britain is hardly in the same league.
You have clearly been searching vigorously, but all you have come up with is some sniper rifles.
The only other "weapons" supplied were armour plated buses, tear gas and water cannon.