firstly, I should have said...ostrich blood vessels.
bill- I don't know why you think creationists don't study how creation works...cant think what I have said that makes you think so. most of the famous scientists in history were creationist.
neither did I claim dino tracks in texas as a proof. I talked about bone! was that a misread or a straw man?
then there is your 99+% argument...is that not an argument from authority, another logical fallacy?. tell me, too, how they explain the methodology of finding radiocarbon in supposedly 65+ myo bone ? does that make sense?.
unless you can demonstrate that these experts you look to, can provide evidence that can only be interpreted evolutionaly, it seems that you are only following the crowd. there is no such thing as consensus science. the consensus has often been wrong.

methinks shimrod needs to take his own advise...