"I think it was shimrod who , above, seems to think I should have a grasp of every scientific argument, while he himself is pretty short of any good argument , let alone a scientific one.
he also thinks I am taking on the leading thinkers of the day, ..."

Hmmmm! Touchy, pete! I must have hit a nerve!

The point that I was making, in my last post, was that modern evolutionary thinking is closely integrated with many other modern scientific fields - you challenge evolution, you challenge all of the others - and, let's be honest, you don't appear to be equipped to do that, pete! And of course it's you that needs the "good arguments" because it is you who is doing the challenging!

And if you read back over many of my previous posts you will see that all that I have done, really, is to ask you some searching, logical questions and recommended a book to you. I deliberately haven't advanced many "arguments" because evolutionary biology is not my field - I'm just an interested observer with a scientific background (and, it has to be said, a deep distrust of religious fundamentalists).