>>>
shimrod, challenging evolutionism in no way challenges scientific disciplines. I think I could even find a [non creationist] quote that that expresses the opinion that all of science progresses very well, without reference to evolution, including biology...that is not to say that it is not mentioned in papers...as an expected gloss.
I think that it is probably the equating of neo Darwinism with natural selection that may make it seem that evolutionism is genuinely pervading science.<<<

I have no idea what you mean here I can guess I guess but it does nt matter. I have point out that your theory of creation includes a universe that is less than 7,000 years old and that challenges EVERY field of science I can think of in untold ways. shimrod is right on this one no matter what you are saying vis a vis "evolutionism."