did anyone understand the snipped piece from "guest"? only bit I got from it was that some mutations have been found to be beneficial,- as opposed to a gain of information. if that was in there it is hidden from a layman like me. perhaps you should contact Nye before the debate, with this proof. and please leave out using Christs name in vain if you want a reply in future
jack..there is nothing in the bible that points to the physical makeup of men and animals having to be radically different. in fact in gen 2 both are spoken of as being formed of the ground, so there is nothing surprising in animals being useful in medicine.

yes, guest, I have read a bit of her stuff. I did not read of her offering any explanation as to why experimentally verified science must give way to evolutionary stories. she just spoke of a sense of wonder..... oh, and also of the resistance to her findings for some time.
jack
unless the tech snip above does demonstrate novel info from mutations , a mutation does not "by definition" produce new info, but in virtually every case deletes it, though that may be beneficial to an organism. a change certainly, but rarely, if ever by new info arising.