" like firing off so many challenges that would take far too long to address all in limited rebuttal time."

I'm sorry pete. I didn't see Ham proper address one of Nye's points with anything more substantial than questions and evasions.

Nye offered science. Ham offered "faith" and evasion. If the Bible is your "scientific" proof and some of the Bible is not scientific proof which Ham readily admitted. Who gets to choose exactly which passages to ignore?