it seems I need to explain to those who don't understand, or it suits them not to, that when I use the term creation scientist, I am juxtaposing that with your use of the word scientist, unqualified, but really which seeks to equate science with evolutionism. whether scientist is qualified by "creationist" or "evolutionist" it denotes their belief system...ie, whether they believe the evidence supports one or the other.
as gould said " the idea of a fully impartial scientist is self serving myth..."

We understand all right, pete. We understand that you understand nothing. So you've read some Gould, huh? And what else do you know he's said? And not off a soundbite website, please!