Sorry, Pete, but unlike some of our friends I'm not going to argue with a true believer.

You seem to be aware of the implied contradictions but are undisturbed by them. There is an enormous amount of biblical scholarship on the subject, and most scholars thoroughly familiar with Genesis seem to agree that the two accounts do not mesh as they should in a supposedly incontrovertible source. Of Course, Ken Ham would be quick to point out that "the truth doesn't rely on majority vote."

As for me, I wasn't there, so I really can't say which if either version may be the more trustworthy.