I'm not a health person. I'm certainly not ignorant.

Your silly yet with nasty intent comparison is used by those with bad agendas all the time and the "health people" as you call them swat the arguments like flies. If they didn't, we would have false flag assurances and concentrate funding in the wrong areas.

Your HIV vs chlamidia circular argument is normally portrayed when foolish people make stupid comparisons and I retort ; which is the biggest risk of death, sky diving or smoking? Trying to pick is similar to you asking people to pick between your choices above.

If you have unprotected sex with someone you meet on a nightclub on the same night, you have, according to HPA estimates, 20% chance of contracting chlamidia and 0.002% chance of exposure to HIV. The risk of exposure leading to positive status, including becoming a carrier is less again. The chances of chlamidia screwing up your life are much lower than HIV but the chances of your infection screwing up the lives of others is much higher.

I wish reality could be so black and white as your simple ignorant portrayal of it. Now piss off and give thanks , it being Sunday, for not having the intelligence to have to understand the troubles of the world. They say it is bliss, lucky twat.