funny you should mention radio carbon, bill. I think shimrod followed too with dating. correct me if I,m wrong but isn't radio carbon only supposed to go back so far....and that so far is a long ways short on some of the supposed dates of evolutionism.
and as shimrod thinks it ok to dismiss the evidence in dino bones...diamonds have radiocarbon in them too.
unless you can cite anything other than circular reasoning, I think observable ,repeatable, testable science demonstrates a lot shorter shelf life.
what is not impossible, is oral and written records from adam to moses.