I've not seen you "cite" a theory about the speed of light vs measured distance to Stars. I was referring to what Ham said in the debate.

If you think I am ranting, you are as wrong about my mood as your are about everything else you have said.

I think your use of the word "cite" is inaccurate. When you cite something, you tell the person where to find it.
All you do is say illogical things and say that you don't care what we think of you. Or say that you don't know what you are talking about.

Tell you what. Show us what the theories are about how creationist scientists explain that light traveled 13.7 billion light years in 6,000 years. If you don't understand the science someone here will explain it to you. No one will lie to you about that. No one will bare false witness the way that Ken Ham lied about "light years."