"I did at one time totally ignore your posts when you were foulmouthed ..."

When was I ever f***ing foulmouthed, pete?!

" ... I would say again that even were it true that 99.9 of scientists were convinced evolutionist, that would not be proof in and of itself that it is true. the most have often been wrong before."

You can only make statements like that, pete, because you don't understand science and you don't understand the difference between science and unquestioning religious faith.

I might also point out that if 0.1% of scientists were 'unconvinced evolutionist' (whatever animal that may be!), it still wouldn't mean that the biblical account of creation is true or is any sort of viable alternative.

As for "strong evidence for [my] origins story" - it's all in Dawkins' book(s) - and he expresses it far better than I can. Of course, there are plenty of other books on evolution besides those written by Dawkins - but they're as good a place to start as any.