"mary swittzer "

If you can't be arsed to even spell her name correctly, you are insulting her. Not very Christian is it.


" well, I suppose he was at least being honest!"

But he's not being a scientist. Was that detractor a scientist? Who was it exactly?


"as the sample tested is old and obviously not recovered from controlled lab conditions there may well be other factors contributing to the result"

Dang! I bet they never thought of that!


"shim rod wants me to cite scientific literature, outside of creation organisations, and probably I could, but am not inclined to take time indulging his fallacy of dismissing information because it comes from a source he rejects."

Along with Shim I'd be interested to see your citations of peer-review literature. You're not indulging a fallacy, you're supporting your argument in the same way scientists do when they disagree on an issue. By NOT citing the literature, you are simply making uninformed statements with zero evidence to back them up.

Put up or shut up Pete.