The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #153681   Message #3604584
Posted By: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
24-Feb-14 - 11:36 PM
Thread Name: BS: Real Non-belief/not militant
Subject: RE: BS: Real Non-belief/not militant
Cappy Jack: ""...that's what happens when your 'logic' is based on emotions, and not reality"
Its what happens when you are so angry with someone that you lose perspective.""

Same thing. Logic, based on emotions, of which 'anger' is but one, can certainly bring around a loss of perspective...Two roads leading to the same destination....(Propaganda plays on that very thing....which I've pointed out numerous times).

Dave the Gnome: "GfS. It was Ake who started likening homosexuals with AIDS to smokers with cancer. Blame him for that whole stupid argument. Don't expect me to answer for him."

Higher lung cancer rates, certainly CAN be linked to smoking, no problem there...HIV/AIDS CAN be linked to either homosexual behavior, OR heterosexual behavior, which ever promiscuity goes thoughtlessly. It would be absolutely foolish to discard the numbers of the transmission rates between homosexuals, just based on a political notion! The rates are higher, percentage wise, amongst homosexuals. THAT is not a bias, nor should a bias be construed from that, that is a FACT!(Remember those??)

Mr./Mrs. Shaw: "I know gay blokes who are celibate from choice."

Hmmm...That's interesting. Are they celibate or homosexual?

The Shaws: ""Male homosexuals are promiscuous" is a disgraceful statement and those who make or support such statements are scurrilous, homophobic bastards. Of course, we already know that about Hate Tony and Refugee from Sanity, don't we."

See above.....better yet, read it again, without bias, one way or another. here, I'll copy it for you.....:
"...HIV/AIDS CAN be linked to either homosexual behavior, OR heterosexual behavior, which ever promiscuity goes thoughtlessly. It would be absolutely foolish to discard the numbers of the transmission rates between homosexuals, just based on a political notion! The rates are higher, percentage wise, amongst homosexuals. THAT is not a bias, nor should a bias be construed from that...that is a FACT!(Remember those??)

Cappy Jack: "OTOH it is a known fact, that SOME "Male homosexuals are promiscuous. I know some who are. You probably do to."

The Shaws: ""Male homosexuals are promiscuous" is a disgraceful statement and those who make or support such statements are scurrilous, homophobic bastards.""

...and how many homosexuals, do you know, who settled down with their first 'lover'?...or do you think that there was some 'playing the field' before they settled?...I mean, didn't they have to find out if they liked it or not???....and you know, some guys might not like it with 'one', as much as the 'other'......They certainly didn't get into it thinking, "I think I want Bruce to have my baby..."

The Shaws: ""Male homosexuals are promiscuous" is a disgraceful statement and those who make or support such statements are scurrilous, homophobic bastards. Of course, we already know that about Hate Tony and Refugee from Sanity, don't we."

Spoken like a true hetero-phobic bastard!!

Just food for thought....don't get indigestion.

Regards,

GfS