It is not acceptable indeed, Keith. And nothing less than 100% testing of all those at risk would achieve anything. It only needs a tiny minority to dissent, for whatever reason they choose, and testing of those responsible enough to have themselves tested voluntarily is completely invalidated. What is more, to force testing, all those at risk would need to be registered and, as we have seen time and time again, those who have access to register will eventually use it for other purposes. Some other uses may well be benign but, as sure as anything, someone will use it for sinister purposes.

It is a proposition that is both unacceptable and unworkable. Those who support it claim they are not capable of telling us how it would be enforced.

DtG