No Ake, I am not in any way suggesting you are "telling lies". I would not suggest that about any poster, as it seems disrespectful, and adds nothing to a discussion.

Does it not seems reasonable to review posted statements before adopting them as factual? It is normal to incorrectly review/analyze situations, as well and related and unrelated surveys/research. That is why it is important to post sources, (versus a "trust me" approach), so Mudcat "peers" site can detect potential errors,odd sources, or confounding factors in assesment-type statements.

I do not intend to "single you out", or to single out anyone. If it seems so, "sorry about that".

I do not read all of the "back and forth - dueling, posts" that seem to add much to the discussion. However, when someone makes a claim that seems "out of whack" to me, I ask questions. Where I notice this with others (I may have missed some, as I (cautiously) came in here late, and as I noted, have not carefully read all posts, as many do not seem to have much content (or, at least new content) related to the topic). I suspect I may get around to asking similar questions, if I stay and if content "fits the criteria" to request more information, or note errors in interpretation-statements (IMO).