yes, shimrod. creationists wrote about it before Darwin did. there is even thinking that Darwin borrowed...shall we say... from blyth [ and other authors]. what Darwin did was extrapolate beyond the observable evidence.

dmcg- I seem to remember that the challenge was for you to provide something from the "mountain of evidence" for evolutionism, that could not also/equally be explained by the creation model.
I have been looking into the marsupial question and found [imo] that I was on the right track. I will extend on that perhaps after you explain....if possible in layman talk....what the convincing evolutionary explanation is.
as far as the accusation of my being choosy re gen 7 v 22f , it seems that the Hebrew word translated "creeping things" has a wide range but understood to mean reptiles, because of the qualifier ...nostrils.
I concede though, at least from the English translation, that an argument could be made that the meaning could conceivably be made that v23 extends the meaning.

I watched the ark press on line thing a few days ago. and it seems that there has not been, is not being, is not expected to be, any taxpayers money used in the planning and construction of the project.
I think aig are still waiting for a retraction of the wrong information. I doubt I would need to retract ,when I say a lot of taxpayers money is spent on Darwinist propaganda.