The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #153464   Message #3609558
Posted By: Musket
14-Mar-14 - 04:36 AM
Thread Name: BS: Darwin's Witnesses
Subject: RE: BS: Darwin's Witnesses
I thought you liked to be accurate Keith? I reckon at least every third post of mine on health issues I preface with pointing out I am not a health professional. I have come into healthcare to give a perspective that the Secretary of State (going back to Milburn) thought was lacking. That does not make me a healthcare professional.

I am fucking important. I am certainly not important. (The distinction, or lack of understanding of the distinction on Keith's part forms part of the thick cunt diagnosis.)

Disgrace is a word I hear a lot of both Radio 4 and whilst watching Question Time. Seems your hearing is as faulty as your reading Keith. Most of the time disgrace is used, it is in the direction of Nigel Farage or other right wing lunatics. A pity you can't hear it really....

At the end of the day, Keith likes dealing it out but moans when he gets it back. He says he likes accuracy but defends hate, even when the evidence the hate is based on contradicts what he has put. He screams that statistics are definitive but when Jim gives him Irish famine statistics, he says his pet historians "take it into consideration." When I say public health bodies take statistics into consideration, he says you can't, because they are true, definitive and are acted on at face value. I am glad he knows my role better than I do. I will have to ask him to participate in a 270 deg. Review of my work.

I take a view on his approach, attitude and inconsistency with a purpose. Which in polite terms would be that I feel it beneath contempt.