I suppose I will have to refute the lies told in the 12:28pm post.

The poster has been caught and proved to be a liar on several occasions in this forum. I make a point of NEVER knowingly lying on this forum, all statistics come from HPE (HPA), or CDC.


"You tell us that in your opinion, gay people get together for sex not love. That all gay relationships are "open" ones with multiple partners."
Blatant lie! What I actually said is that "homosexuals are defined by who they have sex with, not who they love" that is a indisputable fact
"all gay relationships are open ones with multiple partners"
Blatant lie! I quoted a study done in the US which found that "around 50% of male homosexual "marriages", unions, are open relationships containing multiple sexual partners" this study was for a major American city, San Francisco.

"
You wish to force gay people to invasive clinical testing against their will, even when there is no purpose nor reason. You can't accept that gay people can be monogamous or not engage in sex. Or that clinical data shows that a higher proportion of gay people practice safe sex than heterosexual people. You quote data from a foreign country, wrongly I might add, in order to push your odious agenda here. You see the high take up of voluntary testing by gay people as a reason to force testing on the demographic that accesses it most anyway. There are more heterosexual people living with HIV than gay people yet all you wish to do is round up gay people as the only way to stop AIDS."

The above is a load of desperate nonsense, bearing no relation to my views....Of course homosexuals CAN be monogamous, what an idiotic allegation, which of course I never said.

The data from the US is perfectly relevant on this forum, and when I use CDC data I try to say so in my post.

I use quotation marks in homosexual "marriage", as I do not agree that marriage can be between any one but a man and a woman.

Most people in this area of Scotland hold the same view.
The churches hold the same view.
The vast majority of people worldwide hold the same view.

I did say that if male homosexual HIV new infections continue to rise at the present horrific rates, then testing and contact tracing may have to be made compulsory. That was several months ago and I now think compulsion would indeed be unworkable.....but increased testing and contact tracing is imperative if the epidemic is to be halted.


"Free speech?

That isn't free speech. That's abusing free speech to propagate a disgraceful criminal agenda."

Another blatant lie! There is nothing "criminal" in what I write here Most of it comes directly from the health agencies it is NOT a crime to hold alternative views, or express opinions based on published facts.

UNLIKE STALKING and LIBEL, which are crimes under UK and US law.