Thanks for the link. It presents BOTH sides...

No it doesn't. Here is the conclusion -

Consider the obvious problem of survival for individuals who allegedly possess a gay gene: individuals who have partners of the same sex are biologically unable to reproduce (without resorting to artificial means). Therefore, if an alleged "gay gene" did exist, the homosexual population eventually would disappear altogether. We now know that it is not scientifically accurate to refer to a "gay gene" as the causative agent in homosexuality. The available evidence clearly establishes that no such gene has been identified. Additionally, evidence exists which documents that homosexuals can change their sexual orientation. Future decisions regarding policies about, and/or treatment of, homosexuals should reflect this knowledge.

Anyone with a grain of humanity should take particular notice of the last line and shudder. Sorry to inflict it on decent folk. The name should have warned me and thanks for that, Guest, but I didn't think that anything could really be that bad. If you think that is an honest portrayal of 'both sides', GfS, you and I differ so greatly that there is little point in continuing the discussion.

DtG