shimrod...I presume you did not read in context, as I was quoting stu, who claimed dino/bird connection was cut and dried but for the fine details.
the "faithful certainly do think they are in possession of absolute truth" but in your case you can shift the details around when the last evolutionary proof falls foul of subsequent discovery.
and it seems to me that when the latest evo evidence is heralded in the press, that there is little , if any, qualification about it being tentative, in view of the oft repeated assurance that does not do certainties.
we may not prove genesis, but there is plenty of evidence against the evolutionary story, when usual experimental science is applied.

stu...."...guess we've finished talking about....."
I believe you were talking about phylogeny in relation to avian/dino.
perhaps you want to talk about giraffes neck nerves instead?
maybe I will look that up too. it might be another evolutionary assumption!.