Sorry, Jim; but I think you are plain wrong in this instance. It is not "censorship", nor is it "arrogant[ly] proprietorial", to request the courtesy of sticking substantially to the point in a thread, rather than hijacking it to ride a hobby-horse that one [ie you in this instance] has ridden to death in umpteen posts elsewhere, and where there are plenty of other places to continue to exercise it if you really insist on persisting in it. This thread is not about Israel, except by a most marginal train of thought; but plenty of others are; and these would be the places to go on making these points of yours: thus letting those who want to discuss "Islamic radicalism..." (quite large & significant enough a topic to be permitted to proceed without obsessive irrelevancies, or at best marginalities, obstructing the process) to get on with doing so.

So just, if you would be so good, stop being so insufferably patronising with your

"Please don't disappoint me further in following him up his censorship road.
He is certainly not the brightest starfish in the sand-bucket; you really should know better"


and just stick to the point at issue in the thread.

Thanks again...


~M~