You see, Keith, going to a point I mentioned elsewhere, it is statements like 'lists all the places where real persecution exists' that let down your arguments. The New Statesman does not list 'all the places'. Granted, it provides a list that shows some places where persecution exists but I am as sure as I can be that persecution exists in other places as well. And what is 'real persecution' anyway? Is there such a thing as surreal persecution? Remember what I was saying? The media are not telling lies. But they are only telling part of the story.

Cheers

DtG