Precisely. Thank you Musket. So just get hold of all that, Mr wanting-to-have-it-both-ways Offer.

There are only so many ways of stating the obvious; if Dawkins uses the same vocabulary that I was using 60 years before he even wrote a line, how dare you come up with a nasty little innuendo like "strangely similar"!? Don't be so bloody rude! Surprised at you.

"why don't you take the time to respond to what I said about faith being a sacred perspective rather than an ideology based on a false proposition?" you demand rhetorically. Why, because it's complete bollocks not worth wasting time on, if you really want to know.

That's why.

~M~