I reckon, stu, that the same or similar sentiments could be addressed to you........and be just as meaningless.
you keep insisting that you have thoroughly refuted my arguments. my memory must be so bad , though of course you suggest it is more likely dishonesty. I do know though that when I give arguments supported by experimental science ,you just resort to the pious sounding get out, of science not being sure of everything.
yet the obvious attack against creation belies the claim of open mindedness.   "there are no absolutes"......are you absolutely sure of that? !.
shimrod...firstly credit for a clever last line, that made me smile.
other than that your post is just a variation of stu,s. you keep saying that belief does not enter into science, and your objection is noted....and rejected, and I could find quotes by evolutionists who admit the belief and faith dimension of their atheist thinking.
yeh, bill, frustrating is,nt it. I did read the rabbit link , but that appears to be about artificial/natural selection, and that figures into the creation model anyway, but if I missed something, please do point it out.