well, shimrod, where do you think I,m going to get the other side of the story to counter all the Darwin propaganda ?. it is surely evident that I have read more of your evolutionist stuff than you have of creationist.
"...evidence of deep time..."    which is?
"..dinosaurs..." maybe, you have,nt even read my posts. the discovery of stuff that should not have survived[ found in dino bone]is evidence that the dinos could not possibly be as old as alleged. but as I keep saying, you got real faith, and are waiting for observational science to expand to accommodate evolutionary belief.
as to the ark, it has been estimated that all the requisite passengers needed to repopulate after the flood, would fit with room to spare, on the 450 long, 3 deck construction. my information is that there would be diverse genetic information on board to diversify after, producing the array of life we now have.
btw, what is your area of science, and how does it confirm Darwinism for you?.
..