hi joe, me again with my "idiotic" ideas ! "evolution...humbled by the complexity" funny that...sure I,ve been told what a simple idea it is !.
"testy toward bill" ? I,m sure bill knows I am not being disrespectful, though maybe more direct. the claim that the soft tissue in dino bone has been refuted , had not itself been substantiated by bill, nor anyone else, though stu,s post since seems an interesting angle.

seems to me that shimrod is upset because I caught him out in a couple of things.....
there are NO absolutes....but he is not absolutely sure about that !.
he is well versed in science but none of the areas of expertise or interest have a bearing on evolutionism . sounds like an own goal to me. I usually am led to believe that it was vital to science....so I was most sincere in thanking him for the info and insight.

so musket...what is the observational phenomenom that makes evolutionism a credible hypothesis ?.