mrrzy, what evolutionists do , is bait and switch. they point to observations of changes in organisms, and extrapolate from that, that microbes became man, even though that can not be observed. of course, they say that other scientific areas support the theory, but just about any data can be alternately interpreted. even Darwin conceded his own observations were open to other interpretation. sciencegeek observed that human life was not long enough to do experiments in evolution [well, origins science and observational science are not exactly the same !], however observations have been made on fast reproducing organisms, such as flys, but however much change is observed the fly is still the fly.

methinks ,shimrod you are forgetting, that it was you that said your areas of science were not relevant [or similar wording] to evolution.
like I sais.....own goal.