I see jack has proved the point , that he is actively against [he would say the idea of] God, and prefers to stifle discussion by aggressive badmouthing.
"...nothing in nature is inexplicable. much remains to be explained... " says steve. now that seems like, either a contradiction, or a faith position....and a very big one.
"..but we are closing in..." another faith statement.
shimrod, as I keep saying, I admit to my presuppositions, but causality and the impossibility of an infinite regression, imo, makes a logical case for an eternal, supernatural creator.
so, where is the evidence for your belief/hypothesis that there is no need for a creator ?.