""where is the evidence for your belief/hypothesis that there is no need for a creator" shows a lack of understanding of the concept of a hypothesis. You posit the null then seek evidence of its *contrary* - there is no such thing as evidence *for* a null hypothesis."

Very well expressed, if I may say so, Mrrzy?

So you see, pete, the onus is on you to produce evidence for a creator. You might also like to brush up on what the word "logic" means. It certainly does not mean "something that I can believe in" - as you seem to think it does!