Notwithstanding creationism is a key component of most if not all religious cults whereas ridicule has no place in cold logical evaluation of evidence. Ridiculing the ridiculous is fair game though, hence when religion wishes to plug into the scientific process, this happens.

People claiming to be scientists but asserting make believe into their work, or creationist scientists as pete calls them. If they published such conclusions from evidence and applied their appalling excuse for logic in the medical world, they could easily be in court for endangering lives. They certainly couldn't get their logic chopping published in any respected journal.




By the way. I've just checked. Seems that it's sex and Pinot. 😀