Sorry, Johnny, but that's going too far. The original herald article wisely points out this is based on a survey of a little over 3000 but "However, only 14 people in that age group responded to the survey.".

Or to put it another way, it would be a serious error to assume *anything* about the 16-24 year olds in such a tiny sample. Consider, for example, what the 'swing' would be if any of that 14 were replaced by a voter of the opposite persuasion.