just had a read about neural pathways on brittanica. it did not even mention evolution, as far as I could see. in fact , it fits entirely into here and now science, and it looks to me that , it is simply assumed to have evolutionary basis. the other way which you claim Darwinist imput is by studying natural selection/mutations, but without acknowledging that this does not equate to microbes to man evolution, and is part of the creation model too. ie because you believe in it, it is assumed to be relevant. to hear stu talk, it would make you wonder how anything got invented before Darwin !

"...would,nt be prepared to dismiss....." said bill. unless of course they are creation believing scientists !. it just goes to show that it is your a priori dismissal of God that informs your choice of which scientists you will trust before even asking the questions....oops hearing the replies.

don't be so sensitive, shimrod. I am quite happy with your admission that your own extensive training had no bearing on evolution, especially when stu insists all of science is interconnected !.
maybe you need to use some of that extra reading to demonstrate the evolutionism you so passionately believe in.

ed,- how very true. at present, I shall let my critics keep trying to persuade without presenting any proof of their position, and only offer evidence that generally can also be interpreted in the creation model just as well.