Far too sensitive, shimrod. I am not banging on about any lack in your qualifications. Quite the reverse. I am applauding your science qualifications. You admitted they had no bearing on evolution.......contrary to most others who infer science depends on it.             Stu, you are right to correct me, inasmuch as what I should have said was, that ,as I understand it , the major life organisms appear fully formed without transitional evidence beforehand. When I use your term....Cambrian.....it is for convenience. Rather, I view the supposed geological column as roughly equating to order of burial in the noahic deluge disaster.    No, I am not saying that you should stubbornly hold on to something once it has been shown wrong, and i know that is the scientific method to continually reexamine . However, it also has the advantage to evolutionists of their belief being unfalsifiable. Wrong ideas can be recast, and anything that conflicts with here and now science can be shelved in the hope of future resolution in favour of evolutionism !.            Mrr.....the marry was a I pad wrong correct.   Maybe it was just like all those Americans you think are ignorant !                   Dmcg ....it is certainly interesting that such things can be achieved , but do you think your device is going to develop into something else....?? Yes, I think I do see the connection, but how does demonstrating that in device or living organisms support goo to you evolution.......honestly ?,!.