for all I know, greg may be very intelligent, and have a string of letters after his name, but I cant recall a single post that betrays his great mind.
bill, I read the relevant bit of the link. I think you can see that though it purports to demonstrate evolution as observable science, the examples it gave only related to changes within the organism . they call it evolution. then they talk about pond scum to people , and call that evolution, as though it were the same thing. what it is, is bait and switch. best wishes for head clearing.
mrrzy, best I can see, your post describes what you believe rather than demonstrating microbes to man type evolution. I found it strange that you describe single cells as an animal ?.
sciencegeek, you are right in suggesting that going into college level might well lose me, and so you have to again use the argument from authority. but I suspect, that if you could demonstrate that evolution happened beyond change/adaption within the kind, you would do so. tec stuff has been posted before, and although beyond me in details, I could see that it did not evidence slime to sciencegeek evolution.
and who said anything about being a better Christian ?. were I a complete hypocrite, it would not have any bearing on the argument itself. that was not a constructive...dare I say it, scientific...argument imo !