sorry, Ed... but I stand by my observations, based on pete's posts in this and several other threads. His behavior is consistent from thread to thread.

How can you expect honest discourse with someone who responds with comments like this...

"thank you shimrod for answering my question,....and even more for conceding that your science education and interests has no bearing on evolutionist beliefs. to my mind, that means that you do in fact take what you are told about it on faith.
and also, confirming that evolutionism serves no useful purpose, other than providing some well paid jobs for propagating evolutionism."

If I used examples from my work experience, it was because they were handiest. We all have issues, pete's seem to revolve around feeling threatened by science and the theory of evolution in particular. Mine deal more with feeling threatened with the thought of Karl Rove and the Koch brothers taking over my country. As if Sarah Palin as VP wasn't scary enough.