Of course the irony is that the casting of doubt on the veracity of religious texts is only a by-product and unintended consequence of modern science. Although pete has avowed that he doesn't believe that science is a vast anti-religious conspiracy, that is, in fact, how he appears to view it. His determined and constant use of the invented term "evolutionism" is a case in point. His use of that absurd term suggests that he views modern evolutionary biology as a sort of competing dogma to creationism. Meanwhile, in the real world, modern science is an on-going process, not a dogma. Real scientists live day-to-day with uncertainty - something which pete is manifestly unable to do.