" ...though I am getting my arguments from creation sites, I am not saying that creation is true because they say so, but I am using specific arguments gleaned from them ..."

I don't really see the difference; you're still relying on 'authority'. And the likes of Stu, sciencegeek and others have given you lots of "specific arguments" gleaned from real scientists and you still consistently ignore them because they don't supply you with the conclusions that you want.

" ... I do take the bible as authoritive , but in case you have not noticed, when debating non believers [in God that is !] I have used specific non biblical arguments."

But all of your 'arguments' are based on your (strange) belief that all of the myths and parables in the Bible are literally true; that belief is the basis for all of your posts. That sounds like "arguing from authority" to me!