If you are going to accuse of grammatical blunders, Ian, you had better be a bit surer of your ground. The instance you allege, were it indeed erroneous which it isn't [except in typical Musketry-style ?-beggary], would in no way be grammatically, but semantically, based: a typical catachresis on your part, on which you charceristically essay to base a futile-from-the-outset argument. You are actually no more competent in disputation than you are in satire.

Still, carry on. I am a bit loose-endy today, and your pertinacious knicker-twistings are obligingly affording me considerable entertainment.

≈M≈