Steve Shaw started throwing his teddy about when someone with knowledge of Dave Bulmer made a statement that Steve Shaw did not agree with when one or two people tried to explain the pedigree of the poster Steve Shaw again threw teddy. So back to original question Mr Shaw what is your pedigree to comment and who are you?

And what pedigree would you like me to have? No, please do tell me? Would you like me to have been a Bulmer victim first or been his next-door neighbour before exercising my right to free speech? You are a charlatan, dear boy or girl, and you sound every bit like one of those occasional Bulmer lackeys that rear their unwelcome heads here and there every so often. Of course, you have a right to free speech, just like me. I choose to identify myself on every single occasion when I exercise that right. So how about you? As for not agreeing with someone "with knowledge of Bulmer" [sic], well here's what I didn't agree with:

He has had very little praise for the good things he did such as the various tune collections and his staunch support of traditional musicians...

...There is no real financial value in the vast majority of stuff that Dave saved from the landfill despite what so called experts might think.

The kind of "staunch support" that means depriving some of our best musicians the right to have some of their finest material released and promoted? Cor, with support like that who needs denigrators! No financial value? So how come that you know that just a short while after his death yet he didn't realise it for decades and give the bloody stuff back!

Tell you what, mate, at least my throwing my teddy around is childlike and honest, which is a damn sight more than can be said for your brand of sanctimony.

"With knowledge of Dave Bulmer"....Jesus.