Musket, I post serious stuff to support my case.
That was historian Dan Todman writing about the subject of this thread, backing up what I say.
All you can do is make unsupported assertions.
Jim, Paxman is not an historian but his programmes were made in collaboration with the OU History Department.

I am just saying what historians say.
That is where I get it from.
You just spout myths based on ideological dogma.
The argument is you against all the historians.
You lose.