" ... it is you that needs to write to lemski, telling him you ain't looked at his work but a creationist referenced it ..."

No, pete, it really is you that needs to do the work because it's you who keeps obsessing about this Lemski thing. You also keep demanding that we non-creationists give you our opinions on this work. Well, we haven't got any opinions because we're not familiar with it. Which reminds me, how familiar are YOU with Lemski's work? Have you read the original paper(s)? Have you followed up on the references? Have you read any commentaries on the work - other than creationist ones? Thought not!