The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #156088   Message #3686331
Posted By: Keith A of Hertford
16-Dec-14 - 03:35 PM
Thread Name: WWI, was No-Man's Land
Subject: RE: WWI, was No-Man's Land
Scots Bloke (aka Musket) you tried just such a deception a few days ago.

You made a post about the book The Edwardians, implying it contradicted me.
You hoped no-one had read it.
Bad move.

Guest, we can all say what WW1 Generals could have done better.
Historians all do it too, but Wilson states in that piece, "Haig was not the dunderhead, certainly not the intentional butcher, that he's often portrayed as being.

"There's a popular view that Haig really set out to get his troops killed, believing that he would swap one of his men for one of the Germans. There would be a bloodbath on both sides; and because he had rather more men than the Germans, he would, at the end of the day, be left victorious, and the Germans defeated.

"This view of Haig is really quite untrue. Haig, in fact, remained an imaginative commander."