So shimrod, there is a mountain of evidence out there for it is there. Ok, give us a shovelful at a time, show us some evolution !?. You won't though will you. You just take it on faith. If you can't demonstrate it, it is just a belief.               And just because you know more biology than I proves nothing, anymore than if I know more theology than you.       And yes I have produced evidence that evolution is impossible, or rather scientists have. As far back as Louis Pasteur it has been demonstrated that life only comes from life, so darwins evolution could never get started.......I believe that is called a law of nature !.   You assert something as evidenced that is contrary to such laws. And of course, the preservation of various soft tissue that is said to be multimillion yr old is only now accepted as possible, because to hold to experimental science that measures decay rates, would damage the Darwinist paradigm. Or how about trees through strata supposed to be millennia laid down. It should have rotted away and left nothing beyond the very bottom surely.    These and more are evidence against evolutionism. So what do you do if you don't have an answer ? You just resort to saying answers have not been found yet but as evolution is true there must be an answer ?.   Being as you cannot demonstrate the evolutionary story, it seems to me it is more logical to throw it out. Of course if you can demonstrate that it is true........             And stu, do you suppose Galileo would pass peer review at the time ?   How about some arguments, other than appeal to authority. You did make a bit of an effort with the geologic record, which you claimed was so finely graded as to be a problem to creationism.   But not as much as you assumed !.