"literally scores of quotes from established and recognised historians."
Time this was put to bed once and for all.
Your arguments relied on (out of context) quotes from one historian and one tabloid journalist (a non historian you had disqualified to the rest of us because he wasn't a "real historian"), you produced cut-'n-pastes from their writings, neither of which yo had read, and you chose to ignore quotes they had made wit#ch undermined your case.
You failed to convince anybody and that remains the case.
As for the evidence on there being a god - two of the vital ingredients missing from argument are proof and logic, both of which are need if the idea is to make sense.
The belief in a god is as tangible as the once world-wide belief in fairies - once, just as firmly held.
Jim Carroll