Guest,
You claim there is no inconsistency in stating that "most historians" or "not all historians" are one and the same.

Not claimed.
My case was that not all historians agree with Jim.
Later it emerged that most do not.

Incidentally how you can claim this not having read a single book on the subject is uttering stupid.
It is not one of my interests. Sorry

Jim,
I counted dozens of examples of your claiming that your view is that of the majority
It is not my view, never has been and never been claimed.

Do not put things in quotes and ascribe them to me if I never said them.